Geoengineering op grote schaal/andere middelen, waar zijn ze mee bezig ?

[Michel]

Neem wat tijd en bekijk best deze video...  , of lees.
Ook bekend onder ´Chemtrails´ (google)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jf0khstYDLA&feature=related

http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geo-engineering
Geo-engineering is het bewust ingrijpen in het functioneren van de aarde, tegenwoordig is hierbij veelal het doel klimaatverandering tegen te gaan. Het betreft ingrijpende maatregelen die direct effect hebben op grootschalige systemen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoengineering

Background

Several notable organizations have investigated geoengineering with a view to evaluating its potential, including, NASA,[25] the Royal Society,[26] the Institute of Mechanical Engineers,[27][28] and the UK Parliament,.[29] The Asilomar International Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies was convened to identify and develop risk reduction guidelines for climate intervention experimentation.[30]

The major environmental organisations such as Friends of the Earth[31] and Greenpeace[32] have typically been reluctant to endorse geoengineering. Some have argued that any public support for geoengineering may weaken the fragile political consensus to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.[33]

[edit] Proposed strategies

Several geoengineering strategies have been proposed. IPCC documents detail several notable proposals.[34] These fall into two main categories: solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal. However, other proposals exist.

See also: List of proposed geoengineering projects

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geo-Engineering

Der Begriff Geo-Engineering (oder Climate Engineering) bezeichnet vorsätzliche und großräumige Eingriffe mit technologischen Mitteln in geochemische oder biogeochemische Kreisläufe der Erde. Als Ziele derartiger Eingriffe werden hauptsächlich das Stoppen der Klimaerwärmung, der Abbau der CO2-Konzentration in der Atmosphäre oder die Verhinderung einer Versauerung der Meere genannt.

Een oud persbericht (toen nog door menige onwetende wereldvreemde afgedaan als samenzweringstheorie, zie reacties):
http://lvb.net/item/7687


Nu hoort men het regelmatig tijdens het weerbericht (ook op Duitse zenders):
"Dit heeft met weer niets te doen" vb ZDF in 2009 al :
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xot1EI4s6j0
ZDF heute-journal 14.01.2009 Wetter - Chemtrails  (dus een grootschalig experiment... in putje winter)

Het is dus gene zever hé.  

Die National Academy of Sciences (NAS) erwähnte Geoengineering und mehrere Maßnahmen in ihrer Veröffentlichung zu den Implikationen der Globalen Erwärmung aus dem Jahr 1992.[5] Es sind sehr unterschiedliche Überlegungen, die im Begriff „Geo-Engineering“ zusammengefasst werden. Aufgrund ihres unterschiedlichen Lösungsansatzes werden diese Vorschläge in 2 Hauptgruppen unterteilt:[6]

1.Beeinflussung der Sonneneinstrahlung (Solar Radiation Management (SRM)):

Diese Techniken zielen darauf ab, die Abstrahlung von Sonnenlicht zu erhöhen um so einem globalen Temperaturanstieg entgegenzuwirken. Die Konzentration der Treibhausgase in der Atmosphäre und deren weitere Auswirkungen, wie eine mögliche Versauerung der Meere, kann mit SRM nicht direkt beeinflusst werden. Es wird vermutet, dass diese Methoden im Falle einer drohenden Klimakatastrophe relativ rasch einen kühlenden Effekt bringen würden. Insbesondere Aerosol-Ausbringungsmethoden bergen aber große Risiken in Hinblick auf unerwünschte Nebeneffekte (wie beispielsweise eine Schädigung der Ozonschicht oder negative Auswirkungen auf die Gesundheit von Menschen, Tier- und Pflanzenwelt).[7]

2. Reduzierung der CO2-Konzentration in der Atmosphäre (Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR)):
Da diese Methoden direkt an der vermuteten Ursache des Klimawandels (die steigenden CO2-Werte) ansetzen, werden ihre Unsicherheiten und Nebenwirkungen als eher gering eingeschätzt. Im Gegensatz zu SRM-Methoden dürfte es aber Jahre dauern, bis der gewünschte Effekt eintritt. Diese Gruppe umfasst direkte CO2-Beeinflussungsmethoden wie Luftfilterung, CO2-Sequestrierung (CCS), aber auch indirekte Methoden wie Düngung der Meere mit Eisen oder Phosphor.

Schwefeldioxid [Bearbeiten]
Ein prominenter Ansatz lautet, Schwefeldioxid in die Stratosphäre zu befördern, welches Sonnenstrahlen ins All reflektiert und damit die Erwärmung der Erde abschwächt. Die Idee basiert auf Erfahrungen mit Vulkanausbrüchen. So führte der Ausbruch des Pinatubo 1992 zu einem globalen Temperaturabfall von 0,5 °C. Der Ausbruch des Toba vor etwa 75.000 Jahren führte zu einem vulkanischen Winter, der mit geschätzten 3-5, anderen Modellrechnungen zufolge sogar 8-17 °C Abkühlung einherging.

Die Idee stammt ursprünglich von dem russischen Klimatologen Michail Budyko, der sie bereits in den 1970er Jahren veröffentlichte.[8] Der Atmosphärenwissenschaftler Ken Caldeira und die Physiker Lowell Wood und Nathan Myhrvold von der Firma Intellectual Ventures entwickelten den Ansatz, Schwefeldioxid mit Hilfe eines etwa 25 km langen und wenige Dezimeter durchmessenden Schlauchs in die Stratosphäre zu pumpen. Heliumballons würden den Schlauch und mehrere daran befestigte Pumpen tragen. Das am Ende des Schlauchs austretende farblose Flüssiggas würde sich durch Stratosphärenwinde innerhalb von etwa 10 Tagen um die Erde legen. Das Schwefeldioxid könnte als Abfallprodukt aus Ölminen in Kanada stammen. Die notwendige Menge an Schwefel entspricht laut den Entwicklern etwa 1 % der weltweiten Schwefelemissionen. Insgesamt würde die Neutralisierung der globalen Erwärmung 250 Millionen US$ kosten, was verglichen mit den von Nicholas Stern in Verbindung mit Emissionseinsparungen genannten Kosten von jährlich 1,2 Billionen Dollar extrem gering wäre. Zum Vergleich: die Al Gore Foundation gibt jedes Jahr 300 Millionen Dollar für Öffentlichkeitsarbeit aus. Eine auf dem gleichen physikalischen Mechanismus basierende Idee von Intellectual Ventures ist, die Schornsteine mehrerer schwefelemittierender Fabriken mit Hilfe von Heißluftballons und Luftschiffen in die Stratosphäre zu verlängern.[9][10][11]

Mehrere namhafte Wissenschaftler, so der Chemie-Nobelpreisträger Paul Crutzen und der Präsident der NAS Ralph Cicerone befürworten die ähnliche Überlegung, mit Schwefel beladene Heißluftballons in die Stratosphäre aufsteigen zu lassen, um sie dort zu verbrennen. Diese Methode würde laut Crutzen jährlich lediglich 25 bis 50 Milliarden US$ kosten, wird aber von einigen Wissenschaftlern aufgrund möglicher unvorhersehbarer Effekte und der Notwendigkeit eines dauerhaften Schwefeltransports kritisiert.[12]

Aluminium [Bearbeiten]
Im Zuge der American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Conference 2010, San Diego am 20. Februar 2010, wurde vom kanadischen Geoingenieur David W. Keith (University of Calgary) vorgeschlagen, Aluminium anstatt Schwefeldioxid zu verwenden. Begründet wurde dieser Vorschlag mit 1) einem 4-fach größeren Strahlungsantrieb 2) einem ca. 16-fach geringeren Gerinnungsfaktor. Derselbe Albedoeffekt könnte so mit viel geringeren Mengen Aluminium, anstatt Schwefel, bewerkstelligt werden. [13]

Photophoretisch schwebende Nano-Scheiben (aus Aluminium und Bariumtitanat) [Bearbeiten]
Am 7. September 2010 veröffentlichte David W. Keith auf der Website von PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academies of Science), den Vorschlag aus Aluminium, Aluminiumoxid und Bariumtitanat bestehende Nanopartikel in der Stratosphäre auszubringen um Sonnenlicht zu reflektieren. [14]

Die 10 Mikrometer breiten und 50 Nanometer dicken Scheiben sollen in einer Höhe von 40 bis 50 km, knapp über der Stratosphäre, durch Nutzung des photophoretischen Effektes, dauerhaft schweben. Während die Bariumtitanat-Seite der Erde zugewandt sein soll, sollte die aus Aluminium/Aluminiumoxid bestehende Seite der Sonne zugewandt sein. Das auftreffende Sonnenlicht würde größtenteils reflektiert werden, was den Albedoeffekt erhöht und somit zur Kühlung der Erde beitragen könnte. (Der Effekt der Photophorese kann auch bei der Lichtmühle beobachtet werden, dessen Rad sich bei Lichteinfall dreht.)

Funktionsweise: Durch die Sonneneinstrahlung werden die Nanopartikel erwärmt. Da Bariumtitanat Wärme und Energie leichter abgibt als Aluminium, wäre der - durch den photophoretischen Effekt entstehende - Druck auf die Unterseite größer als die Richtung Erde wirkenden Kräfte. Dieser Drucküberschuss würde die Scheiben in einem Schwebezustand, idealerweise in der Mesosphäre, halten. Wird die Bariumtitanat-Schicht elektrisch aufgeladen, würde das natürliche elektrische Feld der Atmosphäre die Scheiben waagerecht halten und ein Kippen verhindern. Nachts würden die Partikel zwar (aufgrund der fehlenden Sonneneinstrahlung) langsam zur Erde sinken, aber tagsüber durch den beschriebenen Effekt wieder steigen.

Zusammensetzung der Nanopartikel:

Oberste Schicht bestehend aus Aluminiumoxid (schützt die mittlere Aluminiumschicht)
Mittlere Schicht aus Aluminium (reflektiert das Sonnenlicht)
Untere Schicht aus Bariumtitanat (für elektrische Aufladung und Photophorese)
Vorteile dieser Methode: Diese Methode des SRM (Solar Radiation Management) würde im Gegensatz zu den Schwefeldioxid-Modellen unerwünschte Effekte auf die Ozonschicht minimieren, da die Scheiben oberhalb dieser schweben würden.

Gesundheitliche Aspekte: Um negative gesundheitliche Auswirkungen zu minimieren (Aluminium und Bariumtitanat sind gesundheitsschädlich) sollten die Nanopartikel idealerweise so hergestellt werden, dass sie eine begrenzte Lebensdauer haben. Sie könnten beispielsweise so hergestellt werden, dass sie durch UV-Strahlung und Sauerstoffradikale zersetzt werden würden.

Enkele foto´s - uitvergrootbaar door aanklikken - van de techniek hier te vinden:
http://real-agenda.com/2012/03/20/chemtrails-beyond-geo-engineering-planetary-weather/

foto: http://educate-yourself.lege.net/cn/inside%20chemtrail%20plane1500w.jpg

via google (is geen Duvel hé  )

[Inazuma]

Het is erg als mensen niet weten wat ze zien, en dan maar de waanzinnigste theorieën gaan verkondigen.

Wat op de foto staat is een standaard belastings- en ladingsverdelingstest bij nieuwe vliegtuigen of -modellen die dan nog niet gecertifieerd zijn voor passagiersvervoer.
In plaats van passagiers, gebruikt men dan water - dat reclameert niet en heeft geen nabestaanden.

[Michel]

Het is erg als mensen niet weten wat ze zien, en dan maar de waanzinnigste theorieën gaan verkondigen.

Wie?
Blijkbaar heb je dus helemaal niets gelezen.

De foto is maar een vb hoe het kan gaan, zoals in de link idd te lezen KAN het hier toevallig over wat anders gaan. maar is helemaal niet zeker.

[Michel]

Het is erg als mensen niet weten wat ze zien, en dan maar de waanzinnigste theorieën gaan verkondigen.

Wat op de foto staat is een standaard belastings- en ladingsverdelingstest bij nieuwe vliegtuigen of -modellen die dan nog niet gecertifieerd zijn voor passagiersvervoer.
In plaats van passagiers, gebruikt men dan water - dat reclameert niet en heeft geen nabestaanden.

Heb je het dan geproefd of gemeten ?  

In places like California and Hawaii, for example, independent researchers, scientists and people in general measured the amounts of heavy metals in their water and soil to reveal the massive poisoning the planet is being subject to through chemtrailing alone. Water and soil samples were submitted for evaluation and the amounts of heavy metals reached tens of thousands of times the normal amounts. All over the United States and Europe, people report the death of thousands of trees and other forms of plant and animal forms, which when analyzed have a common denominator: high concentrations of heavy metals and other chemicals. Surprisingly, most if not all of the areas with the largest number of deaths of animals and plants are far away from industrial centers, which helps reject the idea that their death is a direct result of industrial pollution or human activity. Most of these trees that are dying are located in forests or tropical paradises where the concentration of environmental pollutants is low. In order to confirm that these animals and plants were dying due to the chemicals sprayed over from the sky, analyses were also performed to see if the chemicals in the soil and water corresponded to those found in living animals or plants. Laboratory tests confirmed it.

Researcher Deborah Whitman, who performed her own analysis of dying plants and trees in the city of Solana Beach, California, found that the levels of aluminum were 387 milligrams per kilogram, barium was at 18.4, strontium at 113 and titanium at 15.2.

Along with the load of heavy metals and other chemicals that are sprayed daily by airplanes all over the world, researchers have independently found that other materials contained in the chemtrails are causing people to develop rashes and bruises on their skin. These materials include metallic salts or oxides, engineered biological products and fibers or filaments.The spraying of these materials has changed the the air humans and animals breathe. The air is no longer neutral, a quality that is necessary to support most forms of life. The fibers and filaments are invisible to the human eye, but are easily observed if people use “black lights”. That is how researchers and scientists became aware of their existence. They have called this particles “dry rain”. Scientific evidence shows that in order for the planet to have rainfall, particles of dust and other natural elements in the atmosphere form a nuclei which become unstable and then precipitate in the form of rain. But what happens when someone injects smaller than normal particles into the atmosphere? Those particles never become unstable, and with it they are capable of forming the haze looking man-made clouds that cover the sky after an airplane sprays the chemicals cited above. The smaller the particle, the more stable the water droplet, the lesser rainfall. That is what many call Geo-engineering.

Retired Wildlife Biologist and water specialist Francis Mangels found through laboratory analysis that the levels of Aluminum, Barium and Titanium seen as tolerable in water and soil had been surpassed exponentially. In places where aluminum levels had to be of 0.5 micrograms per liter, Mangels found that pond water had 12,000 micrograms per liter, 24,000 times the normal amounts. Snow drift at Mount Shasta showed levels even greater of 61,000 micrograms per liter, or 122, 200 times the normal level. In a separate analysis, pond water in Bellavista, California, had aluminum levels of 375,000 micrograms per liter. The level of barium reached 3090 micrograms per liter and strontium 345 micrograms per liter. Samples of water and soil taken from below houses presented normal levels of these and other metals.

Of wil je nu echt Geo-engineering ontkennen ?  
http://www.climate-engineering.eu/

Ook militaire experimenten zijn er genoeg, daar zijn zelfs pdf´s van.

[Michel]

nog wat links... ook van IPCC...  ik vraag me af waarom als ze toch maar puur water sproeien.  

See news release below from the ETC Group at the CBD negotiations in Nagoya and watch the press conference of ETC Group explaining the moratorium.

News Release
29 October 2010
www.etcgroup.org


"Geoengineering Moratorium at UN Ministerial in Japan

Risky Climate Techno-fixes Blocked

NAGOYA, Japan – In a landmark consensus decision, the 193-member UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) will close its tenth biennial meeting with a de facto moratorium on geoengineering projects and experiments. “Any private or public experimentation or adventurism intended to manipulate the planetary thermostat will be in violation of this carefully crafted UN consensus,” stated Silvia Ribeiro, Latin American Director of ETC Group.

The agreement, reached during the ministerial portion of the two-week meeting which included 110 environment ministers, asks governments to ensure that no geoengineering activities take place until risks to the environment and biodiversity and associated social, cultural and economic impacts have been appropriately considered. The CBD secretariat was also instructed to report back on various geoengineering proposals and potential intergovernmental regulatory measures.

The unusually strong consensus decision builds on the 2008 moratorium on ocean fertilization. That agreement, negotiated at COP 9 in Bonn, put the brakes on a litany of failed “experiments” – both public and private – to sequester atmospheric carbon dioxide in the oceans’ depths by spreading nutrients on the sea surface. Since then, attention has turned to a range of futuristic proposals to block a percentage of solar radiation via large-scale interventions in the atmosphere, stratosphere and outer space that would alter global temperatures and precipitation patterns.

“This decision clearly places the governance of geoengineering in the United Nations where it belongs,” said ETC Group Executive Director Pat Mooney. “This decision is a victory for common sense, and for precaution. It will not inhibit legitimate scientific research. Decisions on geoengineering cannot be made by small groups of scientists from a small group of countries that establish self-serving ‘voluntary guidelines’ on climate hacking. What little credibility such efforts may have had in some policy circles in the global North has been shattered by this decision. The UK Royal Society and its partners should cancel their Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative and respect that the world’s governments have collectively decided that future deliberations on geoengineering should take place in the UN, where all countries have a seat at the table and where civil society can watch and influence what they are doing.

Link: http://www.etcgroup.org/en/node/5227  werkt niet dan maar deze:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/climateintervention/hRsmOkr3LJI
enz...

....

"Opening of the 16th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP 16)

Cancun - Mexico, 29 November 2010
Statement delivered by Dr Rajendra Pachauri Chairman of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)"

" Work on IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) is well in hand, and the scientific community has responded splendidly to the Panel’s request for its dedicated involvement. A record number of around 3000 nominations of outstanding scientists were submitted for the AR5, and from these a total of 831 have been selected by the IPCC as lead authors and review editors.

The scope of the AR5 has also been expanded over and above previous reports, and would include, for instance, focused treatment of subjects like clouds and aerosols, geo-engineering options, sustainability and equity issues, and much greater focus on the economics and social implications of climate change. The next four years will be marked by intense activity in the IPCC, with two important special reports on renewable energy and extreme events, respectively, due to come out within the next year. In September 2013, the Working Group 1 report as part of the AR5 would be completed, followed rapidly thereafter by the reports of Working Groups II and III respectively. The Synthesis Report of the AR5 will be completed in November 2014, marking the culmination of the AR5 cycle. "

Link: http://www.ipcc.ch/news_and_events/docs/COP16/StatementCancunDrPachauri.pdf


“In recent years there has been a decline in the support for weather modification research, and a tendency to move directly into operational projects.”
~World Meteorological Organization, 2007

http://www.etcgroup.org/content/world-geoengineering



The World of Geoengineering
ETC Group Maps Earth System Experimentation

ETC Group publishes a world map of geoengineering -- the large-scale manipulation of earth or climate systems. While there is no complete record of the scores of weather and climate control projects in dozens of countries, this map is the first attempt to document the expanding scope of research and experimentation. Almost 300 geoengineering projects/experiments are represented on the map belonging to 10 different types of climate-altering technologies.

DOWNLOAD MAP AS [ JPG ] [ PDF ]

In addition to the map, two tables of references are also available for download.

These provide information on the projects/ research/experimentation represented on the map. One table [GeoMap-References.pdf] gives information on geoengineering research and experimentation; a second table [GeoMap-WMinfo.pdf] provides details on weather modification projects.

Related Issues: Climate & Geoengineering.Related Fora: Regional: EU, Asia Pacific, Africa, Americas
Climate: UNFCCC, IPCC
Sustainable Development: Rio+20, CSD
Biodiversity: CBD, SBSTTA, IPBES.Upload:
 worldofgeoengineering_fullsize.pdf
 GeoMap-References.pdf
 GeoMap-WMinfo.pdf

EN een vertaling:
... in Japan op 29 Oktober 2010 het volgende werd beslist:

Moratorium op Geo-engineering (uitstel van Klimaat-manipulatie) op de VN-ministerconferentie in Japan: Riskante technologische klimaatmanipulaties geblokkeerd.

Nagoya, Japan - In een historische consensus beslissen de 193-leden van het VN-Verdrag inzake Biologische Diversiteit (CBD) tijdens hun tiende tweejaarlijkse ontmoeting met een (de facto) moratorium op geo-engineering (klimaat-manipulatie) projecten en experimenten, dat "Elke publieke of private experimenten of avonturisme, manipuleren van de planetaire thermostaat in strijd zal zijn met deze zorgvuldig ontworpen VN-consensus", aldus Silvia Ribeiro, Latijns-Amerikaanse directeur van ETC Group.

De overeenkomst, bereikt tijdens het ministeriële gedeelte van de twee weken durende bijeenkomst van 110 milieuministers, vraagt de regeringen om ervoor te zorgen dat er geen geo-engineering activiteiten meer plaatsvinden met risico's voor het milieu, de biodiversiteit en de daarmee samenhangende sociale, culturele en economische effecten. Het VBD secretariaat werd ook opgedragen om verslag uit te brengen over de verschillende geo-engineering voorstellen en mogelijke intergouvernementele regulerende maatregelen.

De ongewoon sterke consensus/overeenkomst bouwt voort op een moratorium van 2008 ivm. oceaan fertilisatie. Deze overeenkomst, bereikt op COP 9 in Bonn, zet de rem op de litanie van mislukte "experimenten", zowel publieke als private, om de atmosferische kooldioxide te isoleren in de diepe oceanen door het verspreiden van voedingsstoffen op het zee-oppervlak. Sindsdien is de aandacht gericht op een reeks van futuristische voorstellen om een percentage van de zonnestraling via grootschalige ingrepen in de atmosfeer, de stratosfeer en de ruimte, die de verandering van de mondiale temperatuur en neerslagpatronen verhinderen.

"Deze beslissing plaatst duidelijk de maatregelen ivm. geo-engineering van de Verenigde Naties waar ze thuis horen," zei ETC Group Executive Director Pat Mooney. " Deze beslissing is een overwinning voor het gezond verstand, en men zal voorzichtiger moeten zijn. Het zal het rechtmatig wetenschappelijk onderzoek niet remmen. Besluiten ivm. geo-engineering kunnen niet worden gemaakt door kleine groepen van wetenschappers uit een kleine groep van landen die willekeurige richtlijnen opstellen om het klimaat te hacken (kraken,manipuleren). De weinige geloofwaardigheid die deze inspanningen kunnen gehad hebben binnen bepaalde politieke kringen in het Noorden werd aan dingelen geslagen door dit besluit. De Britse Royal Society en haar partners moeten hun initiatief ivm. het reguleren van zonnestraling (Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative) annuleren en respect hebben voor het besluit dat regeringen van alle landen gezamenlijk hebben besloten, nl. dat de toekomstige beraadslagingen ivm. geo-engineering zouden moeten plaatsvinden binnen de VN, waar alle landen een plaats hebben aan de tafel en waar de civiele samenleving kan kijken en invloed hebben op wat ze doen.

En de heren van het IPPC / COP16:

"Opening of the 16th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP 16)
Cancun - Mexico, 29 November 2010
Statement delivered by Dr Rajendra Pachauri Chairman of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)"
...

"Het werk aan het IPCC Vijfde Assessment Rapport (AR5) is goed op snelheid, en de wetenschappelijke gemeenschap heeft op uitermate goede wijze gereageerd op het verzoek van het Panel om haar toegewijde betrokkenheid waar te maken. Een record aantal van ongeveer 3000 voordrachten van prominente wetenschappers waren ingediend voor het AR5, en uit deze zijn een totaal van 831 zijn geselecteerd door het IPCC als belangrijkste auteurs en redacteurs.

Het toepassingsgebied van de AR5 is tevens uitgebreid bovenop de vorige verslagen, en zou bijvoorbeeld de speciale behandeling omvatten van onderwerpen als wolken en aërosolen, geo-engineering (opties van weermanipulatie), duurzaamheid en gelijke behandeling, en zich nog veel meer richten op de economie en sociale gevolgen van de klimaatverandering. De komende vier jaar zal worden gekenmerkt door een intense activiteit binnen de IPCC, met als belangrijkste onderdeel de twee belangrijke speciale verslagen over hernieuwbare energie en extreme gebeurtenissen, die reeds het volgende jaar zouden gepubliceerd worden. In september 2013 moet de werkgroep I een rapport als onderdeel van de AR5 afgeronden en nadien de verslagen van de werkgroepen II en III, respectievelijk. Het syntheseverslag van de AR5 zal worden afgerond in november 2014, een uitvloeisel van de AR5 cyclus. "

[Inazuma]

nog wat links... ook van IPCC...  ik vraag me af waarom als ze toch maar puur water sproeien.  

De luchtvaart is zowat de strafst gecontroleerde tak van alle vervoer, en net daar zou dan niet gedocumenteerde apparatuur in de vliegertjes zitten

Iedereen op en rond de luchthaven , de luchtvaartauthoriteiten, de luchtvaartmaatschappijen, moeten er aan meewerken, want dat goedje moet binnengebracht worden, ingeladen worden - en staat vaneigenst niet op de weight sheet - eender wat gaat al eens kapot, is blijkbaar ook geen probleem; bij een volledig onderhoud over verkoop laat men dat dan telkens netjes zitten, ook al gaat het om niet gedocumenteerde apparatuur ;


Maar nu ge het zegt, ik denk dat zelfs JC hier aan meewerkt met zijn zwever ...  

[Michel]

Maar nu ge het zegt, ik denk dat zelfs JC hier aan meewerkt met zijn zwever ...  

Laat maar zitten.
Sorry, en slaap rustig verder.








Of lees eens wat...
http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=1605&page=433

[Inazuma]

Deze foto van Jeff Wels toont goed wat er normaal zoal van een vleugel af komt - maar je niet altijd allemaal ziet omdat de omstandigheden niet altijd goed zijn daarvoor.



Dat is dus wel wat meer dan enkel de condens van de motoren.

[Michel]

Deze foto van Jeff Wels toont goed wat er normaal zoal van een vleugel af komt - maar je niet altijd allemaal ziet omdat de omstandigheden niet altijd goed zijn daarvoor.



Dat is dus wel wat meer dan enkel de condens van de motoren.

Ja en ?  (denk je dat ik dat niet weet)

Heb je liever meer links meer figuren, meer afbeeldingen, meer vbn als Chemicals to save ozon ofzo ?

Scientists Decide to Consider Considering Geo-engineering

Jeremy Elton Jacquot
Technology / Clean Technology
November 12, 2007

Image courtesy of B. Matthews

In a worrying sign that scientists may be slowly succumbing to the siren song of geo-engineering, a panel of top climate researchers cautiously endorsed a proposal to fund more research looking into unorthodox ways to stop global warming. While no formal statement was released, Phil Rasch, a modeler with Boulder's University Corporation for Atmospheric Research and a member of the panel, spoke for the great majority of his colleagues when he stated: "We're not saying that there should be geoengineering, we're saying there should be research regarding geoengineering."

Even once vehement opponents of such schemes - the best-known of which would consist of pumping aerosols into the stratosphere to mimic a volcano's cooling effect - said that they were slowly warming to the idea. In light of the gravity of current conditions, Daniel Schrag of Harvard University and David Keith of the University of Calgary argued that the controversial field deserved further scrutiny. Claiming that countries would inevitably turn to such strategies once conditions depreciated enough, Schrag suggested that more research now would prevent the most drastic potential consequences from occurring. "We're going to be doing this if we're afraid of something really bad happening, like the Greenland ice sheet collapsing," he explained.

Raymond Pierrehumberg, a contributor to RealClimate, called for a 10-year moratorium on any geo-engineering plan, cautioning his colleagues that further research should only serve as a supplement to efforts aimed at slashing greenhouse gas emissions. Let's hope cooler heads prevail.

Via ::ScienceNOW: Giving Climate Change a Kick (news website)

See also: ::Sounds Risky to Us: Simulating a Volcanic Eruption to Counter Global Warming, ::The Economist Discovers Geo-engineering, ::Wild and Crazy Ideas to Cool the Planet

Tags: Geoengineering
http://www.treehugger.com/clean-technology/scientists-decide-to-consider-considering-geo-engineering.html#_methods=onPlusOne%2C_ready%2C_close%2C_open%2C_resizeMe%2C_renderstart%2Concircled&id=I0_1345498803280&parent=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.treehugger.com

Als de site je niet bevalt neem deze (~ dezelfde afbeelding)

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/080527155519.htm


A schematic representation of various geoengineering and carbon storage proposals. (Credit: Diagram by Kathleen Smith/LLNL = Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

Science News... from universities, journals, and other research organizations

Geoengineering Could Slow Down Global Water Cycle

ScienceDaily (May 27, 2008) — As fossil fuel emissions continue to climb, reducing the amount of sunlight hitting the Earth would definitely have a cooling effect on surface temperatures.

However, a new study from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, led by atmospheric scientist Govindasamy Bala, shows that this intentional manipulation of solar radiation also could lead to a less intense global water cycle. Decreasing surface temperatures through "geoengineering" also could mean less rainfall.

The reduction in sunlight can be accomplished by geoengineering schemes. There are two classes: the so-called "sunshade" geoengineering scheme, which would mitigate climate change by intentionally manipulating the solar radiation on the earth's surface; the other category removes atmospheric CO2 and sequesters it into the terrestrial vegetation, oceans or deep geologic formations.

In the new climate modeling study, which appears in the May 27-30 early online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Bala and his colleagues Karl Taylor and Philip Duffy demonstrate that the sunshade geoengineering scheme could slow down the global water cycle.

The sunshade schemes include placing reflectors in space, injecting sulfate or other reflective particles into the stratosphere, or enhancing the reflectivity of clouds by injecting cloud condensation nuclei in the troposphere. When CO2 is doubled as predicted in the future, a 2 percent reduction in sunlight is sufficient to counter the surface warming.

This new research investigated the sensitivity of the global mean precipitation to greenhouse and solar forcings separately to help understand the global water cycle in a geoengineered world.

While the surface temperature response is the same for CO2 and solar forcings, the rainfall response can be very different.

"We found that while climate sensitivity can be the same for different forcing mechanisms, the hydrological sensitivity is very different," Bala said.

The global mean rainfall increased approximately 4 percent for a doubling of CO2 and decreases by 6 percent for a reduction in sunlight in his modeling study.

"Because the global water cycle is more sensitive to changes in solar radiation than to increases in CO2, geoengineering could lead to a decline in the intensity of the global water cycle" Bala said.

A recent study showed that there was a substantial decrease in rainfall over land and a record decrease in runoff and discharge into the ocean following the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in 1991. The ash emitted from Pinatubo masked some of the sunlight reaching the earth and therefore decreased surface temperatures slightly, but it also slowed down the global hydrologic cycle.

"Any research in geoengineering should explore the response of different components of the climate system to forcing mechanisms," Bala said.

For instance, Bala said, sunshade geoengineering would not limit the amount of CO2 emissions. CO2 effects on ocean chemistry, specifically, could have harmful consequences for marine biota because of ocean acidification, which is not mitigated by geoengineering schemes.

"While geoengineering schemes would mitigate the surface warming, we still have to face the consequences of CO2 emissions on marine life, agriculture and the water cycle," Bala said.
 

Chemicals to save ozone wtf ...   

 

[wooter]

Contrails bestaan - sporen van condensatie. Maar als je over chemtrails begint heb je een rijke fantasie.

[Inazuma]

Het zal er wel wat mee te maken hebben dat dit beginnen opvallen is na 11 september 2001 ...
3 dagen niet vliegen boven de VS had toen een effect op de dagelijkse temperatuurvariatie daar.

Echt verwonderlijk is dat niet als je het enorme aantal vluchten daar in het achterhoofd houdt.

[Michel]

Contrails bestaan - sporen van condensatie. Maar als je over chemtrails begint heb je een rijke fantasie.

 
Natuurlijk bestaan contrails en stop dan je chrono hoelang die kunnen blijven hangen, dan kijk een naar een klok hoelang verdachte "contrails" blijven hangen...

Sinds wanneer wordt Bijbel Wikipedia genegeerd: ?
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geo-Engineering

Instead, the writers prefer the term ‘persistent contrails’ to describe the phenomenon since all contrails are chemtrails. ‘Persistent contrails’ distinguishes those that contain weather-altering additives from those that represent normal aircraft exhaust that dissipates after a few seconds or minutes.

Chemtrails foei voor het woord    is niet officieel maar noem het gewoon geo-engineering of climate engineering door hulp van bepaalde chemische stoffen in bepaalde zeer kleine hoeveelheden.

Dus helemaal niet. De feiten zijn er.  

http://www.kiel-earth-institute.de/projekte/forschung/sondierungsstudie-climate-engineering/view?set_language=de  (Duits of Engels)

http://www.kiel-earth-institute.de/projekte/forschung/gesamtstudie

1.1 Gezielte Eingriffe in das Klimasystem: Climate Engineering

Unter dem Begriff Climate Engineering (CE) werden Maßnahmen zusammengefasst, die explizit dazu angewandt werden, die atmosphärische CO2-Konzentration zu senken oder die Strahlungsbilanz der Erde direkt zu beeinflussen, um so den anthropogenen Klimawandel abzuschwächen bzw. zu kompensieren. In Abgrenzung zum ebenfalls genutzten Begriff des Geoengineering
hebt die Bezeichnung Climate Engineering hervor, dass es um die gezielte Beeinflussung des Klimasystems und nicht etwa um andere Eingriffe in die Umwelt wie die Modifikation von Küsten oder das Umleiten von Flüssen geht. Dabei ist aber zu betonen, dass der Teilbegriff Engineering nicht die ingenieurstechnische Kontrolle des Klimas suggerieren soll, sondern verdeutlicht,
dass diese Eingriffe gezielt vorgenommen werden, um das Klima zu beeinflussenbzw. den Klimawandel zu begrenzen. Climate Engineering erfasst also mehr als bloße Nebeneffekte anderer anthropogener Handlungen wie die Emission von Treibhausgasen.
Climate Engineering grenzt sich von anderen Ansätzen zur Begrenzung des anthropogenen Klimawandels ab, indem Maßnahmen ergriffen werden, die ansetzen, nachdem die Nutzung fossiler Brennstoffe und die Freisetzung der entsprechenden Emissionen in die Atmosphäre stattgefunden haben, aber bevor es zu einer Anpassung hinsichtlich der Auswirkungen des Klimawandels gekommen ist. Entsprechend stellt die industrielle CO2- Abtrennung und -Speicherung (CCS) keine Maßnahme des Climate Engineering dar (Keith 2000).

Climate Engineering umfasst dagegen einerseits Maßnahmen zur ursächlichen Rückführung des Strahlungsantriebs, indem die atmosphärische CO2-Konzentration gesenkt wird, und andererseits Maßnahmen zur symptomatischen Kompensation des Strahlungsantriebs,
indem die Strahlungsbilanz direkt beeinflusst wird. Die ersten werden als Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) und die zweiten als Radiation Management (RM) Maßnahmen bezeichnet. Abbildung 1 illustriert einige der derzeit diskutierten Technologien.
Bei den CDR-Maßnahmen wird bei Nutzung biologischer, chemischer oder physikalischer Prozesse atmosphärisches CO2 durch den Ozean oder die terrestrische Biosphäre aufgenommen bzw. direkt geologisch gespeichert. Die ozeanische CO2-Aufnahme kann zum Beispiel durch Eisendüngung, künstlichen Auftrieb oder Alkalinitätseintrag erhöht werden.
Die terrestrische CO2-Aufnahme kann etwa durch Aufforstung oder die Herstellung von Biokohle erhöht werden. Allerdings lässt sich CO2 auch direkt chemisch aus der Luft filtern, um es in geologischen Formationen an Land oder unterhalb des Meeres zu speichern. Grundsätzlich ließe sich aus der Atmosphäre gefiltertes CO2 auch direkt in den Ozean einleiten, allerdings ist dies seit 2006 durch das London Protocol verboten und soll daher hier nicht weiter verfolgt werden.
Bei den RM-Technologien wird entweder die kurzwellige Sonneneinstrahlung oder die langwellige thermische Abstrahlung direkt beeinflusst. Die kurzwellige Sonneneinstrahlung lässt sich zum einen durch Reflektoren im Weltall reduzieren; zum anderen kann durch Aerosole in der Stratosphäre, durch künstliche marine Schichtwolkenbildung oder durch Modifikationen an der Erdoberfläche deren Rückstrahlung (Albedo) erhöht werden. Die langwellige thermische Abstrahlung lässt sich unter Umständen durch Beeinflussung von Zirruswolken erhöhen.

Chemtrails - Foei   -Symposium in Gent in 2010 Belfort Group:

CLICK LINK Dr Coen Vermeeren Symposium speech,
Afternoon Part 1 video, (starting at about 35 mins.) (29 May 2010) http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/7299427

uit vele bronnen, neem deze :

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20369

At an international symposium held in Ghent, Belgium May 28-30, 2010, scientists asserted that “manipulation of climate through modification of Cirrus clouds is neither a hoax nor a conspiracy theory.” It is “fully operational” with a solid sixty-year history. Though “hostile” environmental modification was banned by UN Convention in 1978, its “friendly” use today is being hailed as the new savior to climate change and to water and food shortages. The military-industrial complex stands poised to capitalize on controlling the world’s weather.

“In recent years there has been a decline in the support for weather modification research, and a tendency to move directly into operational projects.” ~World Meteorological Organization, 2007

Hosted by the Belfort Group, which has been working for the last seven years to raise public awareness of toxic aerial spraying, the Symposium included chemtrail awareness groups from Greece, Germany, Holland, France and the U.S.  Belfort published five videos covering only May 29,[1] when filmmaker Michael Murphy (Environmental Deception and What in the world are they spraying)[2] and aerospace engineer Dr. Coen Vermeeren [3] gave the most dramatic presentations.  

Dr Vermeeren, of the Delft University of Technology, presented [4] a 300-page scientific report entitled, “CASE ORANGE: Contrail Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies.” [5]  

Case Orange notes it was prepared for the Belfort Group by a team of scientists but presented anonymously. It was sent to embassies, news organizations and interested groups around the world “to force public debate.”  

The report spends some time on HAARP, the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, [6] which is a military endeavor focused on ionospheric, electromagnetic, and global electrostatic field manipulation, and on other exotic weapon systems that manipulate the environment. While related, they go beyond this discussion of chemtrails.  

In the interest of brevity, the health and environmental implications of cloud seeding is not discussed in any depth herein. Case Orange does go into it, as did most of the speakers at the Belfort Symposium. Cursory research reveals a debate among researchers as to chemtrail toxicity, but whether that’s a 50-50 or 99-1 argument is unknown.

Contrails Are Chemtrails
Case Orange rejects use of the term ‘chemtrails’ because it is associated with amateur conspiracy theorists. The only credible document it could find that uses it is the Space Preservation Act of 2001 introduced by U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-OH). [7]  H.R. 2977 sought to ban the use of exotic weapon systems that would damage climate, weather, tectonic and biological systems. “Chemtrails” are specifically listed. Though later removed, no version of the bill ever became law.  

Instead, the writers prefer the term ‘persistent contrails’ to describe the phenomenon since all contrails are chemtrails. ‘Persistent contrails’ distinguishes those that contain weather-altering additives from those that represent normal aircraft exhaust that dissipates after a few seconds or minutes.  

Case Orange also rejects misanthropic intentions behind persistent contrails. It shows that geoengineering is fully operational, but rejects it is used to sicken people on the assumptions that 1) public health agencies have the public interest at heart; and 2) the economy is consumer driven. The authors indicate no awareness of numerous reports of collusion between the pharmaceutical industry and government health agencies. This year, a significant conflict-of-interest report appeared in the prestigious British Medical Journal, which further heightened suspicions that the H1N1 flu and its vaccines were a scam.[8]  Nor do the authors consider that sick people will spur economic growth in a capitalist (for profit) health system.

Dr. Vermeeren gave his own introductory remarks and conclusions, but spent the bulk of the hour presenting information from Case Orange. He frankly admitted the existence of persistent contrails.  

“We also know that chemtrails do exist because we do spraying; for crops, for example, and we know that they have been spraying for military purposes. So, chemtrails is nothing new. We know about it.”

En vooral niet op de inhoud ingaan, dat ken ik. 

[wooter]

Michel, het kan, maar het is niet dat alle lijnvluchten ons zitten te cropdusten sinds het begin van lijnvluchten met vliegtuigen met cabines onder druk op grote hoogte.

Contrails zijn contrails, en ook ik denk dat bij jou de hitte van de laatste dagen heeft toegeslagen...

[Michel]

Michel, het kan, maar het is niet dat alle lijnvluchten ons zitten te cropdusten sinds het begin van lijnvluchten met vliegtuigen met cabines onder druk op grote hoogte.

Waar schreef ik dat ?

Contrails zijn contrails, en ook ik denk dat bij jou de hitte van de laatste dagen heeft toegeslagen...

en Chemtrails zijn chemtrails ik denk dat jouw kastje bovenaan dicht staat...
Deze contrails: http://www.dradio.de/dlf/sendungen/forschak/1425897/  zijn het dus NIET

Weeral niet inhoudelijk ingaan op de talrijke links, je hebt tenminste de titel toch gelezen ?
Geoengineering op grote schaal/andere middelen, waar zijn ze mee bezig ?

Waarom wil de IPCC/UN/... iets "verbieden" - het bewezen misbruiken van geo-engineering - of controleren, als het niet bestaat ?

zoiets is in de brood en spelen media niet te vinden hé. LUISTER en kijk (Duits), enkele doc/link uit de video heb ik al geciteerd in post 4.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nTGrYlt1zc&feature=related

UN verbietet Chemtrails. Zwar kann man die Sinnhaftigkeit von Un-Resolutionen anzweifeln, doch ist erstmals offiziell, das es sowas gibt- außerdem ist Bill Gates ein Chemtrail Produzent

Je begrijpt toch Duits ? De UNO verbiedt Chemtrails, het is de eerste keer officieel toegegeven dat zoiets bestaat

Luister naar enkele geo-engineers die ´climate change´ denken te kunnen...:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RsrRpjAGi8&feature=related

Heb je al een antwoord klaar ?  

Heb je ook een antwoord op dit filmpje van een militaire KC 10, contrails zeg je ?   :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSSWnXQsgOU&feature=related  enkele seconden kijken is al genoeg, ge kunt ook de commentaar van de piloot en copiloot volgen op de spray off en dan weer spray volle bak weer aan. (sproeien ze op zeer hoge wolken of is het willekeur ? geen idee... whatever)

En het is zeker geen fuel dumping, ik kan het weten  .

idem: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syvQkviPdDE&feature=related


http://www.tankerenemy.com/2010/07/troppo-tardi-tim-il-caso-del-kc-10-nei.html
site met details (Italiaans, laat zich vertalen)
opgenomen uit een vliegtuig ´in de wachtrij´ met een Canon Powershot SX200.

Bevestiging dat "geoengineering" (ik noem het chemtrails-experimenten) kan (have been proposed) gebeuren met een KC 10:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratospheric_sulfate_aerosols_(geoengineering)#Delivery_methods

Stratospheric sulfate aerosols (geoengineering)

The ability of stratospheric sulfate aerosols to create a global dimming effect has made them a possible candidate for use in geoengineering projects[1] to limit the effect and impact of climate change due to rising levels of greenhouse gases.[2] Delivery of precursor sulfide gases such as sulfuric acid[3], hydrogen sulfide (H2S) or sulfur dioxide (SO2) by artillery, aircraft[4] and balloons has been proposed.[5]

Various techniques have been proposed for delivering the aerosol precursor gases (H2S and SO2).[2] The required altitude to enter the stratosphere is the height of the tropopause, which varies from 11 km (6.8 miles/36,000 feet) at the poles to 17 km (11 miles/58,000 feet) at the equator.

Aircraft such as the F15-C variant of the F-15 Eagle have the necessary flight ceiling, but limited payload. Military tanker aircraft such as the KC-135 Stratotanker and KC-10 Extender also have the necessary ceiling and have greater payload.[4]

[Michel]

en Chemtrails zijn chemtrails

Waarom wil de IPCC/UN/... iets "verbieden" - het bewezen misbruiken van geo-engineering - of controleren, als het niet bestaat ?

Hier beter ´uitgelegd´ voor de verwarde kastjes van "het foei-woord chemtrails"   :  staat op # 9e plaats van het meest gecensureerde woorden  

Rady | October 31, 2010 at 4:59 pm | Reply

 “Chemtrails” is the popular term, not the scientific term. Read the excerpts from the Agreement in the article above* (and note my previous comment where I quoted the relevant portion). Reasonable minds concur this moratorium covers chemtrails.

You won’t find any death certificates that list “heart attack” as the cause of death, either — not because nobody dies from “heart attacks”, but because doctors use the medical term for it (myocardial infarction).

* bron:

http://foodfreedom.wordpress.com/2010/10/28/un-votes-to-ban-chemtrails/
BREAKING: UN Bans Chemtrails
Posted on October 28, 2010

Geoengineering Moratorium Agreed at UN Ministerial in Japan
By ETC Group

Risky Climate Techno-fixes Blocked
...

The full texts of the relevant decisions on geoengineering are copied below:

Under Climate Change and Biodiversity (UNEP/CBD/COP/10/L.36)

8. Invites Parties and other Governments, according to national circumstance and priorities, as well as relevant organizations and processes, to consider the guidance below on ways to conserve, sustainably use and restore biodiversity and ecosystem services while contributing to climate‑change mitigation and adaptation:
….
(w) Ensure, in line and consistent with decision IX/16 C, on ocean fertilization and biodiversity and climate change, in the absence of science based, global, transparent and effective control and regulatory mechanisms for geo-engineering, and in accordance with the precautionary approach and Article 14 of the Convention, that no climate-related geo-engineering activities[1] that may affect biodiversity take place, until there is an adequate scientific basis on which to justify such activities and appropriate consideration of the associated risks for the environment and biodiversity and associated social, economic and cultural impacts, with the exception of small scale scientific research studies that would be conducted in a controlled setting in accordance with Article 3 of the Convention, and only if they are justified by the need to gather specific scientific data and are subject to a thorough prior assessment of the potential impacts on the environment;

[1] Without prejudice to future deliberations on the definition of geo-engineering activities, understanding that any technologies that deliberately reduce solar insolation or increase carbon sequestration from the atmosphere on a large scale that may affect biodiversity (excluding carbon capture and storage from fossil fuels when it captures carbon dioxide before it is released into the atmosphere) should be considered as forms of geo-engineering which are relevant to the Convention on Biological Diversity until a more precise definition can be developed. Noting that solar insolation is defined as a measure of solar radiation energy received on a given surface area in a given hour and that carbon sequestration is defined as the process of increasing the carbon content of a reservoir/pool other than the atmosphere.

[...]

# Sept. 29, 2011 Update: Chemtrail article in Project Censored’s Top 10 most censored stories

Dec. 6, 2010 UPDATE: UN Climate Concern Morphs into Chemtrail Glee Club

Washington Post 10/29: “The prohibition does not apply to the United States, which has yet to ratify the convention.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/29/AR2010102906365.html?hpid=topnews

Geoengineering sparks international ban, first-ever congressional report

#

Chemtrail article in Project Censored’s Top 10 most censored stories

Posted on September 29, 2011 by Rady | 22 Comments
By Rady Ananda

For the past 35 years, Project Censored has published an annual collection of the top 25 censored news stories. In the 2012 book edition, just released this September, my article, Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather Manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails, ranks as the 9th most censored story in the United States.

Originally published at the Centre for Research on Globalization in July 2010, an updated version at COTO Report has seen over 15,000 page views as of this writing.  The article is widely posted across the world in several English and non-English speaking countries, giving it far broader readership than we’ll ever know, but likely over a million.

In addition to citing the symposium speech on which I based my article (supported by three dozen other sources), the Project also included a Commonwealth Club podcast “Man-Made Climate Change in the Skies,” in the new book. That audio-only podcast is a panel discussion by a scientist, two college professors and a former California agriculture employee who has been documenting adverse impacts on agriculture from cloud seeding operations, Rosalind Peterson.

Peterson runs the websites, Agriculture Defense Coalition and California SkyWatch. Her 2009 article, “Persistant Jet Contrails & Man-made Clouds Change our Climate Harming Agriculture & our Natural Resources” is also published in the new book. Also see this 68-minute interview by InfoWars.com.

Ironically, and as if to prove Project Censored’s point, after I posted a link last year to the Atmospheric Geoengineering piece on the “progressive” link site, buzzflash.com, I was banned, and all my contributions removed, though my links often made their front page.

Not surprisingly, even today, Atmospheric Geoengineering continues to be marginalized. A recent hit piece by Rebecca Bowe described “several claims in this year’s list” as “stretching things a bit.” She disparaged my article and Project Censored for having “a fringe obsession with supposedly suspicious airplane contrails.”

Unbeholden to the corporate line, independent media has a different view of my work. Activist Post recently gave me an honorable mention in its Ten Most Influential People in Alternative Media.

“The reporter mischaracterized your story,” said Professor Mickey Huff, the director of the Project. “We have told her and her publisher about it.”

No doubt, chemtrail deniers are more numerous than those who believe the official version of what happened on 9/11.  Yet, publicly available evidence confirming existence of this decades-long project renders such denial absurd. The evidence is overwhelming. This is likely why the subject made it onto Project Censored’s Top Ten.

The Project has also been censored for reporting on 9/11 truth, as this KPFA interview from last year reveals. Inter Press Service contracted with Peter Phillips and Mickey Huff to write the piece, and then refused to publish it and permanently severed their relationship. Huff says the footnotes went on for two pages, though the piece was only a page and a half long. 9/11 Truth is covered in Project Censored’s 2011 edition.

A history professor at Diablo Valley College in Contra Costa County, California, Mickey Huff explains that the selection process for censored stories begins with public nominations.

A committee of college students from over 30 colleges around the world then reviews them for media coverage using a variety of databases including Lexis Nexis.  If a story is under-represented, the students then fact check the article and consult with experts.  After stories have been validated, a team of judges ranks their favorites and the results are calculated.

In addition to the top 25 censored stories for the year (April 2010 through March 2011), the book covers several more topics related to media censorship and democracy.  Here’s the Top Ten 2012 countdown:

#10 Statistical Games with the Unemployment Rate. At Information Clearing House, Greg Hunter showed that instead of 9%, the real unemployment rate is over 22%.

#9 Chemtrails. Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather Manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails, Rady Ananda, July 10, 2010.
...
#1 US Soldier Suicides Exceed Combat Deaths in 2010. Cord Jefferson broke the story on Jan. 27, 2011 at Iceland’s Good Magazine.
...
http://foodfreedom.wordpress.com/2011/09/29/chemtrail-article-in-project-censored%E2%80%99s-top-10-most-censored-stories/